subsidy
A subsidy is money the government spends to keep a price artificially low, and somebody always pays for it eventually.
In plain English
A subsidy makes something cheaper than it truly costs, and the difference is paid by the government, which means it is paid by the country.
Nigeria's long argument about fuel subsidy is the clearest example in the world. For years, petrol was sold below its real cost and the state covered the gap. The intention was to protect ordinary people, and to a real extent it did.
But the money had to come from somewhere. It came from the budget, which meant less for roads, hospitals and schools. It encouraged smuggling to neighbouring countries where the price was higher. And it benefited people who consumed the most fuel, who were generally not the poorest.
Removing it caused immediate, severe pain for ordinary Nigerians, because transport and food prices rise almost overnight. That pain is not theoretical and it should never be waved away.
Both things are true at once, which is why this argument never ends. A subsidy protects people today and costs the country tomorrow, and every government has to decide which of those it can survive.
Understanding that trade explains most of what you read about the Nigerian economy.
Petrol is subsidised, so you pay less at the pump. The government covers the difference from the same budget that would have built the road you drive on. You gained at the pump and lost on the road, and neither cost appeared on a receipt.
Questions people ask
Why did removing fuel subsidy hurt so much?
Because transport underpins the price of almost everything. When fuel rises, food, goods and services follow within weeks, and wages do not.
Are subsidies always bad?
No. Well targeted subsidies can protect the vulnerable effectively. The criticism is usually about who actually benefits and what the money could otherwise have built.
Who benefits most from a fuel subsidy?
Generally those who consume the most fuel, which tends not to be the poorest. That is the central argument against it, and it is a serious one.
Last reviewed